Trump wants to talk trade
However, one deal that Trump might wish to discuss this week with Moon is the free trade agreement between the U.S. and South Korea.
In April, Trump referred to the current free trade deal with South Korea as “unacceptable,” vowing it would be renegotiated or scrapped, according to a Reuters interview.
The five-year-old deal, also known as KORUS, was negotiated by the Obama administration and Trump claimed it was “a horrible deal made by Hillary [Clinton],” a former Secretary of State and his rival in the presidential election.
A report last year by the Economic Policy Institute, a nonpartisan think tank, found that trade deficits with South Korea cost in excess of 95,000 American jobs from 2011 to 2015. It indicated that most of the loss in jobs was in the manufacturing sector.
“I suspect there will be an effort at renegotiation,” said Cato’s Bandow, a former special assistant to President Ronald Reagan. “The South Koreans are fairly protectionist.”
Much of South Korea’s trade is controlled by conglomerates, or chaebol, which are usually owned by a family and account about 90 percent of the gross national product.
South Korea is the sixth-largest goods trading partner of the U.S. with $112 billion in goods traded in 2016, although there was a trade deficit with South Korea of almost $28 billion last year and when including services another $10.7 billion.
“Trump seems to be much more hostile to a free-trade deal than a number of his appointees,” said Bandow. “But even the president has talked about support for bilateral agreements.”
Regardless, Bandow said he wouldn’t be surprised if Defense Secretary James Mattis and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson “kind of sit down with him (Trump) and emphasize this is a treaty ally. We have a lot at stake there. The economic relationship is part of that.”
South Korea ranks as the world’s fifth-largest economy and its largest trading partner is China followed by the U.S.
China’s pushback over THAAD anti-missile system
Meantime, China has been putting economic and diplomatic pressure on South Korea over the controversial THAAD system, which stands for Terminal High Altitude Area Defense.
“China isn’t stopping North Korea but it is trying to stop South Korea from depending itself,” said Heritage’s Cheng. “China appears to expect South Korea to do what China wants regardless of whether it can protect itself.”
THAAD was deployed in South Korea after several years of discussion with Seoul, but when Moon got into office he suspended it and announced an environmental impact assessment, which will effectively result in a delay in the full implementation of four additional launchers that are already there in South Korea. Trump also suggested in April that South Korea should pay $1 billion for the THAAD system but the administration later downplayed such talk although it already added to strains in the alliance.
“There’s the possibility that there could be additional discussions about how long this [THAAD] review is going to take,” said Scott Snyder, a Washington-based senior fellow for Korea studies and director of the program on U.S.-Korea policy at the Council on Foreign Relations.
Added Snyder, “The U.S. is probably going to want to hear President Moon is committed to implementing the missile defense system regardless of any pressure that China tries to put on South Korea in order to have that decision reversed.”
China is opposed to THAAD because it believes the advanced anti-missile system’s powerful radar gives the U.S. and South Korea capability not only to spot ballistic missiles from North Korea, but to potentially look deep into China to monitor military activities. The THAAD site is located in a town about 420 miles from China.
“The Chinese government has boycotted a lot of the South Korean firms,” said Hoover’s Henriksen. “It’s put pressure on not allowing tourists to go to South Korea.”
The boycott called for by China’s state media hasn’t just hurt tourism but it’s resulted in food shipments to China falling in recent months. It also impacted South Korean-owned retail companies operating in China, including some forced to close.
Even so, experts suggest the boycott has been costly for China in some respects too.
Bandow said the trade retaliation has led to China being seen now as a “pariah state in South Korean public opinion. The South Koreans now have a lower opinion of China than Japan — and that takes quite a bit of work.”